JDIR issue (Success Criteria for Dental Implants Over the Past 48 Year…
페이지 정보
본문
Background and Purpose
Although dental implants have demonstrated high long-term success rates, the definition of implant success has evolved considerably over time. Early criteria focused primarily on osseointegration and implant survival, whereas contemporary concepts incorporate peri-implant tissue health, prosthetic function, esthetics, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This review aimed to summarize the historical evolution of implant success criteria and propose a comprehensive contemporary concept of implant success in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Korean Academy of Implant Dentistry (KAID).
Materials and Methods
A narrative review was conducted using major English-language publications from Brånemark’s pioneering studies in 1969 through the Seventh ITI Consensus Conference in 2023. The literature was reviewed according to implant success criteria, study design, level of evidence, and consensus recommendations.
Results
The earliest success criteria focused on implant mobility, radiographic bone loss, absence of infection, and long-term survival. Subsequently, prosthetic stability, esthetic outcomes, and peri-implant soft tissue health became essential components of implant success. More recently, patient satisfaction and quality of life have emerged as critical outcome measures. The 2023 ITI Consensus emphasized PROMs and dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs) as key elements of implant success evaluation. KAID opinion leaders further proposed a comprehensive framework incorporating functional rehabilitation, absence of pain and infection, esthetic harmony, stable osseointegration, biological stability, and patient satisfaction.
Conclusion
Implant success in 2026 should not be defined solely by survival rates or numerical thresholds. Rather, successful implant therapy requires long-term functional stability, esthetic integration, biological harmony, and meaningful patient satisfaction. Future implant success criteria are expected to become increasingly patient-centered and outcome-oriented.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54527/jdir.2026.45.3.39
Although dental implants have demonstrated high long-term success rates, the definition of implant success has evolved considerably over time. Early criteria focused primarily on osseointegration and implant survival, whereas contemporary concepts incorporate peri-implant tissue health, prosthetic function, esthetics, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This review aimed to summarize the historical evolution of implant success criteria and propose a comprehensive contemporary concept of implant success in celebration of the 50th anniversary of the Korean Academy of Implant Dentistry (KAID).
Materials and Methods
A narrative review was conducted using major English-language publications from Brånemark’s pioneering studies in 1969 through the Seventh ITI Consensus Conference in 2023. The literature was reviewed according to implant success criteria, study design, level of evidence, and consensus recommendations.
Results
The earliest success criteria focused on implant mobility, radiographic bone loss, absence of infection, and long-term survival. Subsequently, prosthetic stability, esthetic outcomes, and peri-implant soft tissue health became essential components of implant success. More recently, patient satisfaction and quality of life have emerged as critical outcome measures. The 2023 ITI Consensus emphasized PROMs and dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs) as key elements of implant success evaluation. KAID opinion leaders further proposed a comprehensive framework incorporating functional rehabilitation, absence of pain and infection, esthetic harmony, stable osseointegration, biological stability, and patient satisfaction.
Conclusion
Implant success in 2026 should not be defined solely by survival rates or numerical thresholds. Rather, successful implant therapy requires long-term functional stability, esthetic integration, biological harmony, and meaningful patient satisfaction. Future implant success criteria are expected to become increasingly patient-centered and outcome-oriented.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54527/jdir.2026.45.3.39
댓글목록
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.
