JDIR Issue (Practice-based dental implant loss analysis: 381 case seri…
페이지 정보
본문
[JDIR Issue (Practice-based dental implant loss analysis: 381 case series and 25 years of experience of one practitioner)]
1. Purpose
To identify potential risk factors associated with dental implant failure based on a 25-year practice-based case series conducted by
a single practitioner.
2. Methods
Records of 381 dental implants placed in 118 patients between 2000 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.
Variables examined included age, sex, systemic health conditions (such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases),
smoking status, implant size and shape, and type of restorative treatment.
Multivariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate relationships between potential risk factors and implant failure.
3. Results
The frequency of implant failure ranged from 4% to 9%. No clear association was observed between implant failure and
demographic factors, systemic health conditions, implant design, or restorative treatment type.
Early failures were mainly related to lack of osseointegration, whereas late failures were primarily associated with peri-implantitis.
4. Conclusion
The findings suggest that dental implant failure occurs in approximately 10% of implants and may be largely influenced by
individual susceptibility rather than identifiable clinical risk factors.
These results highlight the importance of preventive strategies and further research on biological susceptibility to peri-implantitis.
1. Purpose
To identify potential risk factors associated with dental implant failure based on a 25-year practice-based case series conducted by
a single practitioner.
2. Methods
Records of 381 dental implants placed in 118 patients between 2000 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.
Variables examined included age, sex, systemic health conditions (such as diabetes and cardiovascular diseases),
smoking status, implant size and shape, and type of restorative treatment.
Multivariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate relationships between potential risk factors and implant failure.
3. Results
The frequency of implant failure ranged from 4% to 9%. No clear association was observed between implant failure and
demographic factors, systemic health conditions, implant design, or restorative treatment type.
Early failures were mainly related to lack of osseointegration, whereas late failures were primarily associated with peri-implantitis.
4. Conclusion
The findings suggest that dental implant failure occurs in approximately 10% of implants and may be largely influenced by
individual susceptibility rather than identifiable clinical risk factors.
These results highlight the importance of preventive strategies and further research on biological susceptibility to peri-implantitis.
- 이전글Kwan-Tae Noh Vice Chair, Prosthodontics Division (2026 Osstem Implant Community (OIC) Global Consensus: Prosthetic Guidelines for the Prevention of Implant Complications and the Maintenance of Peri-Implant Tissue Stability)
- 다음글JDIR Issue (Successful implant placement using a UV-treated implant in a site with recurrent oroantral fistula)
댓글목록
등록된 댓글이 없습니다.



